Attorney-at-Law Jayantha Thilakarathna stated that claims made by a lawyer alleging they were not given an opportunity to voice their opinions during a discussion with the President are completely false.
Speaking at a press conference organized by Lawyers for National People’s Power (NPP) in Colombo on August 26, Thilakarathna emphasized that he personally attended the meeting and witnessed the dialogue firsthand.
Highlighting the importance of constructive debate, Attorney Thilakarathna noted:
“Opposing judicial reforms proposed by the government is a democratic right, provided it is done constructively. However, launching destructive campaigns targeting the Chief Justice and other judicial officers directly threatens the independence of the court system. Neither inside nor outside Parliament do we have the authority to defame judges, as it creates unnecessary suspicion among the public.”
He further addressed arguments raised by critics regarding the timing of the proposed 22nd Constitutional Amendment:
Contradictory Opposition: He pointed out that critics claimed they would agree to the amendment if introduced after December, raising questions as to why introducing it now poses an issue if the content itself is acceptable.
National Interest vs. Personalities: He clarified that the government introduced this reform not for any individual’s benefit, but to enhance the efficiency, discipline, and overall structure of the judicial framework in line with the mandate given by the public.
Refuting BASL Claims: Addressing statements made by the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) President regarding alleged threats, Thilakarathna urged him to specify where and how such an incident occurred, emphasizing that open debate is welcome without coercion.
Thilakarathna concluded by reassuring the public that the judicial reforms will minimize case delays, curb corruption, and establish a streamlined court system, calling on all parties to engage in healthy dialogue rather than resorting to baseless mudslinging.
